Main Article Content


This research have a purpose to know is there an influence of problem solving abilty to students mathematical thinking, and to know how strong problem solving ability affect students mathematical thinking. This research used descriptive quantitative method, which a population is all of students that taking discrete mathematics courses both in department of Information Systems and department of mathematics education. Based on the results of data analysis showed that there are an influence of problem solving ability  to students mathematical thinking either at department of mathematics education or at department of information systems. In this study, it was found that the influence of problem solving ability to students mathematical thinking which take place at mathematics education department is stonger than at information system department. This is because, at mathematics education department, problem-solving activities more often performed in courses than at department of information system. Almost 75% of existing courses in department of mathematics education involve problem solving to the objective of courses, meanwhile, in the department of information systems, there are only 10% of these courses. As a result, mathematics education department student’s are better trained in problem solving than information system department students. So, to improve students’ mathematical thinking, its would be better, at fisrtly enhance the problem solving ability.


Students’ mathematical thinking problem solving ability

Article Details


  1. Breen, S., & O'Shea, A. (2010). Mathematical Thinking and Task Design. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin(66), 39-49.
  2. Ersoy, E., & Guner, P. (2015). The Place of Problem Solving and Mathematical Thinking in The Mathematical Teaching. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education-January, 5(1).
  3. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical Tasks and Student Cognition: Classroom-Based Factors that Support and Iinhibit High-Level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 524-549.
  4. Ishida, J. (1997). The Teaching of General Solution Methods to Pattern Finding Problems Through Focusing On an Evaluation and Improvement Process. School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 155-162.
  5. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically Secon Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  6. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.
  7. Schorr, R. Y. (2000). Impact at the Student Level: a Study of the Effects of a Teacher Development Intervention on Students' Mathematical Thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(2), 209-231.
  8. Scussa, T. (2008). Five Processes of Mathematical Thinking. Retrieved 2016, from
  9. Soedjadi, R. (1999). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
  10. Stacey, K. (2005). The Place of Problem Solving in Contemporary Mathematics Curriculum Documents. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3), 341-350.
  11. Stacey, K. (2006). What is Mathematical Thinking and Why is it Important.Progress Report of the APEC Project: collaborative studies on innovations for teaching and learning mathematics in different cultures (II)—Lesson study focusing on mathematical thinking.
  12. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  13. Watson, A. (2001). Instances of Mathematical Thinking Among Low Attaining Students in an Ordinary Secondary Classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(4), 461-475.
  14. Weber, K. (2005). Problem-Solving, Proving, and Learning: The Relationship Between Problem-Solving Processes and Learning Opportunities in the Activity of Proof Construction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3), 351-360