Article Sidebar

Published
Jan 29, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2227 Download : 1633

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to test RME learning with an effective scientific approach to improving mathematical literacy and self-efficacy, obtaining an overview of the mathematical literacy diagnostic assessment results that has high, medium and low self-efficacy as well as student difficulties in learning RME with a scientific approach. This research using mix method concurrent embedded with the subject of research is students class VIII. The research begins with a mathematical literacy diagnostic assessment and self-efficacy inventory then performed RME learning in experimental class and conventional learning in control class. Quantitative analysis was conducted to test the effectiveness of learning and deepened with the interview as a qualitative analysis. Learning RME with a scientific approach effective is marked by the achievement of classical completeness, the proportion of students' mathematical literacy, self-efficacy and the difference in pre-post students’ mathematical literacy on RME learning better than conventional learning. The results of students’ mathematical literacy diagnostic assessment fit the criteria of self-efficacy students except for medium mathematical literacy that having high self-efficacy. Student difficulties in RME learning with the scientific approach are based on the results of mathematical literacy diagnostic assessment, namely language skills problem, the capacity to understand, create strategies, and create the algorithm.

Keywords

Mathematics Literacy Self-efficacy RME Diagnostic

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 1-18.
  2. Dewanto, S. (2008). Peranan Kemampuan akademik Awal, Self-efficacy, dan Variabel Non Kognitif Lain terhadap Pencapaian Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Educationist, 8(2), 123-133.
  3. Dzulfikar, A. (2013). Studi Literatur: Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam Mengatasi Kecemasan Matematika dan Mengembangkan Self Efficacy Matematis Siswa. Seminar dan Musyawarah Nasional MIPA (pp. 45-54). Yogyakarta: UNY.
  4. Dzulfikar, A., Asikin, M., & Hendikawati, P. (2012). Keefektifan Problem Based Learning dan Model Eliciting Activities terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1-6.
  5. Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2006). Theories of Personality. Ed. VI. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  6. Haji, S., & Abdullah, M. I. (2015). Membangun Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Melalui Pebelajaran Matematika Realistik. Infinity, 4(1), 39-46.
  7. Hidayat, B. R., Sugiarto, B., & Pramesti, G. (2013). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal pada Materi Ruang Dimensi Tiga Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa (Penelitian dilakukan di SMA Negeri 7 Surakarta Kelas X Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Solusi, 1(1), 39-46.
  8. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: an Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  9. Krismiati, A. (2013). Penerapan Pembalajaran dengan Pendidikan PMR secara Berkelompok untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa di Kelas X SMA. Infinity, 2(2), 123-135.
  10. Mukhid, A. (2009). SELF-EFFICACY (Perspektif Teori Kognitif Sosial dan Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan). Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 1-17.
  11. Nicolaidou, M., & Philippou, G. (2003). Attitudes Towards Mathematics, Self-Efficacy and Achievement in Problem Solving. European Research in Mathematics Education III. Pisa: University of Pisa. 1-11
  12. Peters, M. (2013). Examining the relationshops among classroom climate, self-efficacy, and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: a multi-level analysis. International Journal Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2); 459-480.
  13. Pintrich, P.R. and De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1); 33-40.
  14. Satoto, S., Sutarto, H., & Pujiastuti, E. (2012). Analisis Kesalahan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal dengan Prosedur Newman. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2).
  15. Shute, V. J., Graf, E. A. and Hansen, E. G. (2006), DESIGNING ADAPTIVE, DIAGNOSTIC MATH ASSESSMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH AND WITHOUT VISUAL DISABILITIES. ETS Research Report Series, 2006: i–37. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2006.tb02007.x
  16. Somakim. (2011). Membangun Kepercayaan Diri (Self-Efficacy) Siswa Melalui Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Pidato Ilmiah: UNSRI.
  17. Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 2(2) ;95-126.
  18. Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  19. Tandililing, E. (2010). Implementasi Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) di Sekolah. Jurnal Guru Membangun, 25(3).
  20. Tarigan, D. (2006). Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidkan Tinggi.
  21. Wardono dan Mariani, S. (2014). The Realistic Learning Model With Character Education And PISA Assessment To Improve Mathematics Literacy. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 361-372.
  22. Wigfield, A & Eccles, J. (2001). Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego: Academic Press.
  23. Wilkens, Hendrianne, J. (2011). Textbook approval systems and the Program for International Assessment (PISA) results: A preliminary analysis. IARTEM e-Journal, 4(2), 63-74
  24. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American educational research journal, 29(3), 663-676.