Article Sidebar

Published
Jan 28, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 366

Main Article Content

Abstract

As an international benchmark, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 evaluates the educational performance of 15-year-old students across various countries. It has been observed that the average mathematics score globally declined in 2022. Understanding the responses of mathematics teachers, as practitioners, to the PISA 2022 results is crucial for evaluating the reasons behind this decline in mathematics scores. This research aims to explore and understand the perspectives of Indonesian mathematics teachers on the factors contributing to the low PISA 2022 mathematics scores. This study employs a qualitative approach, with participants being randomly selected and includes interviews with 36 mathematics teachers in Indonesia. According to the statements provided by teachers, the decline in mathematics scores in the 2022 PISA, relative to the years 2018 and 2015, can be attributed to six primary factors: pandemic-related issues, curriculum, individual factors, resource limitations, student factors, and parental involvement. Subsequently, mathematics teachers provided several recommendations for the government, schools, and parents that might enhance student mathematics achievement. These recommendations include conducting more training, improving ICT facilities in schools, and strengthening parental knowledge about the importance of parental support. The findings of this study offer various recommendations that could be implemented by the government, schools, and mathematics teachers to improve student mathematical achievement and potentially increase PISA scores in 2025.

Keywords

Mathematical performance Math teacher PISA 2022

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Afgani, M. W., & Paradesa, R. (2021). PISA-Like problems using Islamic ethnomathematics approach. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p203-216

  2. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2023). Changing representations of student achievement: The need for innovation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2192513

  3. Alfaruki, A. A. (2022). The concept of merdeka belajar from the view of constructivism. EL-TARBAWI, 15(2), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.20885/tarbawi.vol15.iss2.art4

  4. Al-Tameemi, R. A. N., Johnson, C., Gitay, R., Abdel-Salam, A.-S. G., Hazaa, K. A., BenSaid, A., & Romanowski, M. H. (2023). Determinants of poor academic performance among undergraduate students—A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100232

  5. Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13(1), 79-107. https://doi.org/10.28945/3958

  6. Andrietti, V., & Su, X. (2019). Education curriculum and student achievement: theory and evidence. Education Economics, 27(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1527894

  7. Atasoy, R., Çoban, Ö., & Yatağan, M. (2022). Effect of ICT use, parental support and student hindering on science achievement: Evidence from PISA 2018. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.945869

  8. Attard, L., & Busuttil, L. (2020). Teacher perspectives on introducing programming constructs through coding mobile-based games to secondary school students. Informatics in Education, 19(4), 543-568. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.24

  9. Aydin, H., Ozfidan, B., & Carothers, D. (2017). Meeting the challenges of curriculum and instruction in school settings in the United States. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 76-92.

  10. Betthäuser, B. A., Bach-Mortensen, A. M., & Engzell, P. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01506-4

  11. Bustomi, A., Zuhairi, Z., & Ilmudinulloh, R. (2021). The problems of learning media at university amid COVID 19 post new normal in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra', 15(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v15i2.1564

  12. Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443-3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7

  13. Crato, N. (2021). Setting up the scene: Lessons learned from PISA 2018 statistics and other international student assessments. In N. Crato (Ed.), Improving a country’s education: PISA 2018 results in 10 countries (pp. 1-24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4_1

  14. Curtis, K. M. (2006). Improving student attitudes: A study of a mathematics curriculum innovation. Kansas State University.

  15. Dewantara, A. H., Setiawati, F. A., & Saraswati, S. (2023). Towards numeracy literacy development: A single-case study on the use of the living book homeschooling model. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p225-242

  16. Edumadze, J. K. E., Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., & Baffour Jnr, N. O. (2023). Undergraduate student's perception of using video conferencing tools under lockdown amidst COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5799-5810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2018618

  17. Ekawati, R., Susanti, S., & Chen, J.-C. (2020). Primary students’ mathematical literacy: A case study. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p49-58

  18. Foster, N., & Schleicher, A. (2022). Assessing creative skills. Creative Education, 13(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.131001

  19. Guo, J. R., Liu, Y., Chen, Y. R., Chai, G. L., & Zhao, X. Q. (2022). Psychological support for public-funded normal students engaged in teaching profession. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 940431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940431

  20. Habibi, A., Razak, R. A., Yusop, F. D., Mukminin, A., & Yaqin, L. N. (2020). Factors affecting ICT integration during teaching practices: A multiple case study of three Indonesian universities. Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4150

  21. Harisman, Y., Mayani, D. E., Armiati, A., Syaputra, H., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2023). Analysis of student's ability to solve mathematical literacy problems in junior high schools in the city area. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p55-68

  22. Harisman, Y., Noto, M. S., & Hidayat, W. (2020). Experience student background and their behavior in problem solving. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p59-68

  23. Hendriana, H., Prahmana, R. C. I., Ristiana, M. G., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2022). The theoretical framework on humanist ethno-metaphorical mathematics learning model: An impactful insight in learning mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1030471. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1030471

  24. Hidayat, W., & Aripin, U. (2023). How to develop an e-LKPD with a scientific approach to achieving students' mathematical communication abilities? Infinity Journal, 12(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p85-100

  25. Hidayat, W., & Husnussalam, H. (2019). The adversity quotient and mathematical understanding ability of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012025

  26. Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Ginanjar, A., & Putri, R. I. I. (2022). An ePub learning module and students' mathematical reasoning ability: A development study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp103-118

  27. Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Hamidah, I., & Putri, R. I. I. (2023). How can android-based trigonometry learning improve the math learning process? Frontiers in Education, 7, 1016. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1101161

  28. Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J.-A. (2018). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the programme for international student assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726

  29. Hsiao, C.-C., Tiao, M.-M., & Chen, C.-C. (2016). Using interactive multimedia e-Books for learning blood cell morphology in pediatric hematology. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0816-9

  30. Hutajulu, M., Wijaya, T. T., & Hidayat, W. (2019). The effect of mathematical disposition and learning motivation on problem solving: An analysis. Infinity Journal, 8(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p229-238

  31. Kartianom, K., & Ndayizeye, O. (2017). What‘s wrong with the Asian and African students’ mathematics learning achievement? The multilevel PISA 2015 data analysis for Indonesia, Japan, and Algeria. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.16931

  32. Kaur, B., Zhu, Y., & Cheang, W. K. (2019). Singapore’s participation in international benchmark studies—TIMSS, PISA and TEDS-M. In T. L. Toh, B. Kaur, & E. G. Tay (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Singapore (pp. 101-137). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3573-0_6

  33. Kemdikbudristek. (2023). PISA 2022 dan pemulihan pembelajaran di Indonesia - Laporan PISA Kemdikbudristek [PISA 2022 and learning recovery in Indonesia - Kemdikbudristek PISA Report]. Kemdikbudristek. Retrieved from: https://lpmpdki.kemdikbud.go.id/pisa-2022-dan-pemulihan-pembelajaran-di-indonesia

  34. Khine, M. S., Fraser, B. J., Afari, E., & Liu, Y. (2023). Language learning environments and reading achievement among students in China: evidence from PISA 2018 data. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09404-8

  35. Kilenthong, W. T., Boonsanong, K., Duangchaiyoosook, S., Jantorn, W., & Khruapradit, V. (2023). Learning losses from school closure due to the COVID-19 pandemic for Thai kindergartners. Economics of Education Review, 96, 102455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102455

  36. Kurniansyah, M. Y., Hidayat, W., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2022). Development of combined module using contextual scientific approach to enhance students' cognitive and affective. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p349-366

  37. Laelasari, L., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Analysis of students’ mathematics resilience abilities on linear program material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 042005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042005

  38. Lawson-Body, A., Willoughby, L., Lawson-Body, L., & Tamandja, E. M. (2020). Students’ acceptance of E-books: An application of UTAUT. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(3), 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1463577

  39. Lestari, D. I., Waluya, S. B., & Mulyono, M. (2020). Mathematical literacy ability and self-efficacy students in search solve create and share (SSCS) learning with contextual approaches. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 9(2), 156-162.

  40. Lewis, S. (2017). Communities of practice and PISA for schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance? Education policy analysis archives, 25(92), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2901

  41. Limaymanta, C., Apaza-Tapia, L., Vidal, E., & Gregorio-Chaviano, O. (2021). Flipped classroom in higher education: A bibliometric analysis and proposal of a framework for its implementation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(9), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.21267

  42. Ma, L., Luo, H., & Xiao, L. (2021). Perceived teacher support, self-concept, enjoyment and achievement in reading: A multilevel mediation model based on PISA 2018. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101947

  43. Martinovic, D., & Manizade, A. G. (2020). Teachers using geogebra to visualize and verify conjectures about prapezoids. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(3), 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00103-9

  44. Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skill teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.006

  45. Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Riady, Y., Alqahtani, T. M., Chaerunisaa, A. Y., Wijaya, T. T., Milanda, T., Yusop, F. D., & Albelbisi, N. A. (2023). COVID-19 distance and online learning: A systematic literature review in pharmacy education. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04346-6

  46. Mustafa, Z., & Salim, H. (2012). Factors affecting students’ interest in learning Islamic education. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(13), 81-86.

  47. Navarro-Martinez, O., & Peña-Acuña, B. (2022). Technology usage and academic performance in the PISA 2018 report. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(1), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2022.1.735

  48. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  49. Onitsuka, K., Hidayat, A. R. R. T., & Huang, W. (2018). Challenges for the next level of digital divide in rural Indonesian communities. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 84(2), e12021. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12021

  50. Pandey, D., Ogunmola, G. A., Enbeyle, W., Abdullahi, M., Pandey, B. K., & Pramanik, S. (2022). COVID-19: A framework for effective delivering of online classes during lockdown. Human Arenas, 5(2), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00175-x

  51. Pertiwi, C. M., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2021). The students' mathematical problem-solving abilities, self-regulated learning, and VBA microsoft word in new normal: A development of teaching materials. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p17-30

  52. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481

  53. Puad, L. M. A. Z., & Ashton, K. (2023). A critical analysis of Indonesia's 2013 national curriculum: Tensions between global and local concerns. The Curriculum Journal, 34(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.194

  54. Putra, Z. H., Witri, G., & Sari, I. K. (2020). Prospective elementary teachers’ perspectives on online mathematics learning during corona virus outbreak. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012057

  55. Rohaeti, E. E., Evans, B. R., Wiyatno, T., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, W. (2023). Differential learning assisted with SANTUY mobile application for improving students’ mathematical understanding and ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp275-292

  56. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). Problem-based learning and student motivation: The role of interest in learning and achievement. In G. O'Grady, E. H. J. Yew, K. P. L. Goh, & H. G. Schmidt (Eds.), One-Day, One-Problem: An Approach to Problem-based Learning (pp. 85-101). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-75-3_5

  57. Sistyawati, R. I., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., Samsuriyadi, S., Alwi, Z., Sepriliani, S. P., Tanjung, A. L., Pratiwi, R. P., Aprilisa, S., & Nusantara, D. S. (2023). Development of PISA types of questions and activities content shape and space context pandemic period. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p1-12

  58. Sjøberg, S., & Jenkins, E. (2022). PISA: A political project and a research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1824473

  59. Supianti, I. I., Yaniawati, P., Osman, S. Z. M., Al-Tamar, J., & Lestari, N. (2022). Development of teaching materials for e-learning-based statistics materials oriented towards the mathematical literacy ability of vocational high school students. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p237-254

  60. Tamur, M., Ndiung, S., Weinhandl, R., Wijaya, T. T., Jehadus, E., & Sennen, E. (2023). Meta-analysis of computer-based mathematics learning in the last decade Scopus database: Trends and implications. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p101-116

  61. Umbara, U., Prabawanto, S., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2023). Combination of mathematical literacy with ethnomathematics: How to perspective sundanese culture. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p393-414

  62. Wang, X. S., Perry, L. B., Malpique, A., & Ide, T. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: a systematic review. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8

  63. Wijaya, T. T., Mutmainah, I. I., Suryani, N., Azizah, D., Fitri, A., Hermita, N., & Tohir, M. (2021). Nineth grade students mistakes when solving congruence and similarity problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2049(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2049/1/012066

  64. Wijaya, T. T., Rahmadi, I. F., Chotimah, S., Jailani, J., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2022). A case study of factors that affect secondary school mathematics achievement: Teacher-parent support, stress levels, and students' well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316247

  65. Xiao, F., & Sun, L. (2021). Students’ motivation and affection profiles and their relation to mathematics achievement, persistence, and behaviors. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 533593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.533593

  66. Ying, L., Kai, L., Mo, C., & Leyi, L. (2017). The Innovation and Practice of Engineering Drawing Teaching Based on All-Around Opening Labs. Journal of Graphics, 38(1), 123-127.