Main Article Content


This research aims to investigate the students’ mathematical representation ability through the implementation of Maple in learning definite integral and those with ordinary learning. This research used a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study was students of 2nd semester of Mathematics Education Program at PGRI Palembang University Academic year 2017/2018. The sample in this study were students of class II.A and II.B, class II.A as a control group and class II.B as experiment group. Data were collected through a test of mathematical representation ability. Data in this study were analyzed through descriptive quantitative. The result of this study showed that students’ mathematical representation ability through implementation Maple in learning definite integral better than those who get the ordinary learning.


Definite Integral Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability Maple

Article Details


  1. Awang, T. S., & Zakaria, E. (2013). Enhancing students’ understanding in integral calculus through the integration of Maple in learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 204-211.
  2. Garvan, F. (2001). The Maple book. New York. Retrieved from
  3. González-Martín, A. S., & Camacho, M. (2004). What is first-year Mathematics students' actual knowledge about improper integrals?. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 35(1), 73-89.
  4. Grundmeier, T. A., Hansen, J., & Sousa, E. (2006). An exploration of definition and procedural fluency in integral calculus. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 16(2), 178-191.
  5. Huang, C. H. (2015). Calculus Students’ Visual Thinking of Definite Integral. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 476-482.
  6. Hutagaol, K. (2013). Pembelajaran kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Infinity Journal, 2(1), 85-99.
  7. Kilicman, A., Hassan, M. A., & Husain, S. S. (2010). Teaching and learning using mathematics software “The New Challenge”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 613-619.
  8. Ningsih, Y. L., & Paradesa, R. (2018). Improving students’ understanding of mathematical concept using maple. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012034.
  9. Noor, N. M., Sulaiman, H., Alwadood, Z., Halim, S. A., Wahid, N. F. S., & Ab Halim, N. A. (2018). Development of Learning Tools using Maples for Engineering Mathematics Subject. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 9(1), 131-138.
  10. Nursyahidah, F., & Albab, I. U. (2017). Investigating student difficulties on integral calculus based on critical thinking aspects. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 211-218.
  11. Oberg, T. D. (2000). An investigation of undergraduate calculus students ’ conceptual understanding of the definite integral. Retrieved from
  12. Paradesa, R., Zulkardi, Z., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2013). Bahan Ajar Kalkulus 2 Menggunakan Macromedia Flash Dan Maple Di Stkip Pgri Lubuklinggau. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 95-109.
  13. Rangkuti, A. N. (2014). Representasi matematis. Forum Paedagogik, 6(1), 110-127.
  14. Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika UIN Antasari, 1(2), 33-44.
  15. Serhan, D. (2015). Students' Understanding of the Definite Integral Concept. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 84-88.
  16. Tall, D. (1993). Students’ difficulties in calculus. In proceedings of working group, 3, 13-28.
  17. Yuliana, Y., Tasari, T., & Wijayanti, S. (2017). The Effectiveness Of Guided Discovery Learning To Teach Integral Calculus For The Mathematics Students Of Mathematics Education Widya Dharma University. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 01-10.