Main Article Content

Abstract

The weak ability for students to correctly attempt word problem question in mathematics have pushed researcher to study multiple approach in attempting such questions. This study examined the effectiveness of the Bar Model as a problem solving heuristic in improving Year 8 students’ performance in solving word problems involving ratio. A total of thirty-three Year 8 students from a secondary school in Brunei Darussalam were involved in the study. Data were collected through pre-test and post-test. Paired sample t-test on the mean score of pre-test and post-test showed a significant improvement in the students’ mean marks (t = - 8.079).  The results also revealed that the Bar Model is capable of helping students of all abilities particularly the weaker students. Hence for this study, the Bar Model successfully enhanced the lower secondary students’ performance in solving word problems involving ratio, particularThy when presented as public examination questions.

Keywords

Bar Model Brunei Darussalam Mathematics Word Problem Problem Solving Ratio

Article Details

Author Biography

Khairul Amilin Tengah, Universiti Brunei Darussalam

Lecturer, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education

References

  1. Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 52(3), 215-241. doi:10.1023/A:1024312321077

  2. CDD. (2006a). Mathematics syllabus for lower primary school. Gadong: Curriculum Department, Ministry Of Education, Brunei Darussalam.

  3. CDD. (2006b). Mathematics syllabus for upper primary school. Gadong: Curriculum Department, Ministry Of Education, Brunei Darussalam.

  4. Charles, R. (2011). Solving word problems: Developing quantitative reasoning. Retrieved from http://assets.pearsonschoolapps.com/playbook_assets/MatMon110890Charles_SWP_Revise_eBook1.pdf

  5. Chin, K. S., & Clements, M. A. K. (2001). O-level students’ understanding of lower secondary school geometry. In Energising science, mathematics, and technical education for all: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference of the Department of Science and Mathematics Education, 213-222.

  6. Denis, M. (1991). Imagery and thinking. In Imagery and cognition, 103-131. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-6407-8_4

  7. Gani, M. A., Tengah, K. A., & Said, H. (2019). Bar Model as Intervention in Solving Word Problem Involving Percentage. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(1), 69-76. doi:10.12928/ijeme.v3i1.11093

  8. Goh, S. P. (2009). Primary 5 pupils' difficulties in using the model method for solving complex relational word problems (Doctoral dissertation). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

  9. Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and instruction, 7(4), 293-307. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00006-6

  10. Hajar, S. (2015). Brunei sees improved results in PSR exams. Borneo Bulletin.

  11. Jalil, I. (2015). PSR maths results still low: MOE. The Brunei Times.

  12. Khalid, M., & Tengah, M. K. A. (2007). Communication in mathematics: The role of language and its consequences for English as second language students. In Third APEC-Tsukuba International Conference Innovation of Classroom Teaching and Learning through Lesson Study III—Focusing on Mathematical Communication, CRICED, University of Tsukuba, 1-8.

  13. Kho, T. H., Yeo, S. M., & Lim, J. (2009). The Singapore model method for learning mathematics. Marshall Cavendish education.

  14. Liu, Y. M., & Soo, V. L. (2014). Mathematical Problem Solving – The Bar Model Method. Scholastic Education International. Singapore.

  15. Madani, N. A., Tengah, K. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). Using bar model to solve word problems on profit, loss and discount. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012103. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012103

  16. Mahoney, K. (2012). Effects of Singapore's model method on elementary student problem solving performance: Single subject research (Doctoral dissertation). Northeastern University.

  17. Ng, S. F., & Lee, K. (2005). How primary five pupils use the model method to solve word problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 60-83.

  18. Ng, S. F., & Lee, K. (2009). The model method: Singapore children's tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 282-313.

  19. Piaget, J. (1971). The psychology of intelligence. Boston: Routledge and Kegan.

  20. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1966). Mental imagery in the child. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  21. Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Vol. 85). New Jersey: Princeton university press.

  22. Pungut, M. H. A., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Students’ english language abilities in solving mathematics word problems. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2014, 1-11.

  23. Raimah, M. (2001). An investigation of errors made by primary 6 pupils on word problems involving fractions. Dissertation. Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

  24. Saman, A. (2000). Investigating understanding by primary six pupils of word problems involving multiplication and division. Dissertation. Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

  25. Sian, K. J., Shahrill, M., Yusof, N., Ling, G. C. L., & Roslan, R. (2016). Graphic organizer in action: solving secondary mathematics word problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 83-90. doi:10.22342/jme.7.2.3546.83-90

  26. Simpol, N. S. H., Shahrill, M., Li, H. C., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Implementing thinking aloud pair and Pólya problem solving strategies in fractions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012013. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012013

  27. Tengah, K. A. (2011). Using simplified Sudoku to promote and improve pattern discovery skills among school children. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2(1). doi:10.7916/jmetc.v2i1.710

  28. Timah, U. (2006). Primary 5 pupils' performance on mathematical word problems using model-drawing/box-diagram strategy. Dissertation. Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

  29. Vaiyatvutjamai, P., & Clements, M. A. (2004). Analysing errors made by middle-school students on six linear inequations tasks. Globalisation trends in Science, Mathematics and technical Education 2004, 173-182.

  30. van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 39(6), 496-506. doi:10.1177/00222194060390060201

  31. van Garderen, D., & Montague, M. (2003). Visual‐spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(4), 246-254. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00079