Understanding mathematical abstraction: A systematic literature review of its conceptualizations and research practices
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Mathematical abstraction is a fundamental concept in learning mathematics and plays a significant role in students' mathematical understanding. While this classic topic has been studied by mathematics education experts for a long time, both conceptually and in practice, it has many interpretations. This study aims to systematically review literature published from 2016 to 2022 in the Scopus database on mathematical abstraction. This review focuses on definitions of mathematical abstraction, research methods, mathematical topics, and educational levels in studies of mathematical abstraction. Using a systematic literature review approach, 68 articles and conference papers were initially identified, and after applying the PRISMA flowchart, 23 documents were selected that focused on mathematical abstraction. The studies were then analyzed through content analysis. The results showed that mathematical abstraction is generally understood as a process of constructing students' mathematical knowledge by drawing on prior mathematical expertise or experience. The majority of studies conducted used qualitative research methods at the Junior High School level, aiming to describe the abstraction process among students, including the difficulties encountered. At the same time, the most chosen mathematical topic was geometry. One of the most interesting findings of this research is that research on mathematical abstraction focuses more on assessing abstraction abilities through students' problem-solving performance than on examining how learners construct mathematical concepts. This indicates the need for future research to explore the process of student concept development in greater depth, thereby strengthening theoretical and pedagogical understanding of mathematical abstraction.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.References
Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Information Age Publishing.
Cahyani, L., Masriyah, M., & Budi Rahaju, E. (2019). Students’ reflective abstraction of middle school in reconstructing quadratic equation concept based on high mathematical ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012044
Camci, F., & Tanışlı, D. (2020). Sixth-grade students’ mathematical abstraction processes in a teaching experiment designed based on hypothetical learning trajectory. Education and Science, 45(204), 111–141. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8464
Chin, H., Chew, C. M., & Suseelan, M. (2022). Mathematics learning from concrete to abstract (1968-2021): A bibliometric analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.99.9.4
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 420–464). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
Conde, M. A., Sedano, F. J. R., Fernandez-Llamas, C., Goncalves, J., Lima, J., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2020). RoboSTEAM project systematic mapping: Challenge based learning and robotics. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), (pp. 214–221). https://doi.org/10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125103
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Learning and teaching geometry, K-12 (pp. 1–16). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Dewi, I., Siregar, N., & Andriani, A. (2018). The analysis of junior high school students’ mathematical abstraction ability based on local cultural wisdom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012076
Dewi, I., Siregar, N., & Andriani, A. (2020). Trial of design means-end analysis learning model based on local cultural wisdom to improve communication ability and mathematical abstraction of middle school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1), 012081. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012081
Ding, M., & Li, X. (2014). Transition from concrete to abstract representations: the distributive property in a Chinese textbook series. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9558-y
Dreyfus, T. (2014). Abstraction in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 5–8). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_2
Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2015). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context: Theory as methodological tool and methodological tool as theory. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 185–217). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_8
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfeld (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275–282). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
Ferrari, P. L. (2003). Abstraction in mathematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1316
Fitriani, N. (2018). Proses abstraksi matematis siswa SMP pada konsep bangun ruang sisi lengkung melalui pendekatan realistic mathematics education dengan model van Hiele [The process of mathematical abstraction of junior high school students on the concept of curved-sided geometric shapes through a realistic mathematics education approach with the van Hiele model]. Doctoral dissertation. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. https://repository.upi.edu/46004
Fitriani, N., & Nurfauziah, P. (2019). Gender and mathematical abstraction on geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012052
Fitriani, N., Suryadi, D., & Darhim, D. (2018). Analysis of mathematical abstraction on concept of a three dimensional figure with curved surfaces of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012037
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hakim, L. L., & Nurlaelah, E. (2018). Mathematical mindsets: the abstraction in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012048
Harry, A. R., Cahya, E., & Jupri, A. (2020). Mathematical abstraction abilities of hight school students in term of cognitive style. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296504
Hong, J. Y., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Mathematical abstraction in the solving of ill-structured problems by elementary school students in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1204a
Hutagalung, E. E., Mulyana, E., & Pangaribuan, T. R. (2020). Mathematical abstraction: students’ concept of triangles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032106
Iswari, I. F., Susanti, E., Hapizah, H., Meryansumayeka, M., & Turidho, A. (2019). Design of problem-solving questions to measure mathematical thinking type abstraction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 012104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012104
Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1), 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108
Kadarisma, G., Fitriani, N., & Amelia, R. (2020). Relationship between misconception and mathematical abstraction of geometry at junior high school. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p213-222
Khasanah, N., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Nurhasanah, F. (2021). Analisis kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan masalah abstraksi matematis pada pokok bahasan fungsi [Analysis of difficulties in solving mathematical abstraction problems on the topic of functions]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3445
Kholid, M. N., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Muhaimin, L. H., Juandi, D., Sujadi, I., Kuncoro, K. S., & Adnan, M. (2023). A systematic literature review of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2269047. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2269047
Kilicoglu, E., & Kaplan, A. (2022). Predicting the mathematical abstraction processes using the revised Bloom’s taxonomy: Secondary school 7th graders. Athens Journal of Education, 9(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.9-2-4
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Lame, G. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169
Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40247947
Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2004). Abstraction in mathematics and mathematics learning. The 28th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 329–336.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Perumusan masalah dalam penelitian kualitatif [Qualitative research methodology: Problem formulation in qualitative research].
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Murtianto, Y. H., Sutrisno, S., Nizaruddin, N., & Muhtarom, M. (2019). Effect of learning using mathematica software toward mathematical abstraction ability, motivation, and independence of students in analytic geometry. Infinity Journal, 8(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p219-228
Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga [Causes of difficulties in learning three-dimensional geometry]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836
Nurhasanah, F. (2018). Mathematical abstraction of pre-service mathematics teachers in learning non-conventional mathematics concepts. Doctoral dissertation. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. https://repository.upi.edu/49513
Nurhasanah, F., Kusumah, Y. S., & Sabandar, J. (2017). Concept of triangle: Examples of mathematical abstraction in two different contexts. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5782
Nurhasanah, F., Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Suryadi, D. (2017). Mathematical abstraction: Constructing concept of parallel coordinates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012076
Nurhasanah, F., Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Suryadi, D. (2018). Relationship between mathematical abstraction in learning parallel coordinates concept and performance in learning analytic geometry of pre-service mathematics teachers: an investigation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012130. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012130
Nurhasanah, F., Sabandar, J., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2013). Abstraction processes in learning geometry using GSP. In 6th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (EARCOME6), Phuket, Thailand (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1452.0005
Nurrahmah, A., Zaenuri, Z., & Wardono, W. (2021). Analysis of students difficulties in mathematical abstraction thinking in the mathematics statistic course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042112
Panjaitan, B. (2018). The reflective abstraction profile of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style of field independent and field dependent. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012094
Phuong, N. L., Hien, L. T. T., Linh, N. Q., Thao, T. T. P., Pham, H.-H. T., Giang, N. T., & Thuy, V. T. (2023). Implementation of STEM education: A bibliometrics analysis from case study research in Scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2278. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13216
Piaget, J. (1977). Recherches sur l'abstraction réfléchissante [Studies in reflecting abstraction]. Presses Universitaires de France.
Piaget, J. (2000). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings, 2(7), 33–47.
Priatna, N., Martadiputra, B. A. P., & Wibisono, Y. (2018). Developing geogebra-assisted reciprocal teaching strategy to improve junior high school students’ abstraction ability, lateral thinking and mathematical persistence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012142. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012142
Putra, J. D., Suryadi, D., & Juandi, D. (2018). Mathematical abstraction ability of prospective math teacher students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012049
Putra, R. W. Y., Sunyono, S., Haenilah, E. Y., Hariri, H., Sutiarso, S., Nurhanurawati, N., & Supriadi, N. (2023). Systematic literature review on the recent three-year trend mathematical representation ability in scopus database. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p243-260
Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
Saitta, L., & Zucker, J.-D. (2013). Abstraction in artificial intelligence and complex systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7052-6
Scheiner, T. (2016). New light on old horizon: Constructing mathematical concepts, underlying abstraction processes, and sense making strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9665-4
Skemp, R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics (2nd ed.). Penguin.
Subroto, T., & Suryadi, D. (2018). Epistemological obstacles in mathematical abstraction on abstract algebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012032
Sumen, O. O. (2019). Primary school students' abstraction levels of whole-half-quarter concepts according to RBC theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7488.251-264
Teppo, A. (1991). Van Hiele levels of geometric thought revisited. The Mathematics Teacher, 84(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.84.3.0210
van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., Bay-Williams, J. M., Wray, J. A., & Brown, E. T. (1998). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Pearson.
van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight. Academic Press.
van Oers, B., & Poland, M. (2007). Schematising activities as a means for encouraging young children to think abstractly. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03217453
Wang, T., & Cai, J. (2007). Chinese (Mainland) teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. Zdm, 39(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0030-7
Worthington, M., Dobber, M., & van Oers, B. (2019). The development of mathematical abstraction in the nursery. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09898-3
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17723971
Zhang, Y. (2023). Analysis of how the music curriculum can contribute to the implementation of quality education from a cognitive developmental perspective. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 11(1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/11/20230745
Zhou, M., & Brown, D. (2015). Educational learning theories: 2nd edition. Education Open Textbooks. https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks/1